youpatheticcreature:

queergladers:

minhosundies:

the maze runner au where everything is the same except minho walks like pingu 

"Shouldn’t someone give a pep talk or something?" Minho asked, pulling Thomas’s attention away from Alby.

"Go ahead," Newt replied.

Minho nodded and faced the crowd. “Noot noot.”

guys image

besuto asked: Could you remind me when Ramsay or anyone in the show said that Myranda is Ramsay's girlfriend? Because I just think that she is a not-this-time-for-play toy of Ramsay.

Well he called her “my lady” I think? and held her hand so when I don’t think she’s an ‘official’ love relationship with him (like soon to be fiancée or else) I do think there is a kind of relationship. Maybe she’s just her lady-friend, girl-friend whatever the issue of Myranda stays the same to me :)

ryanjamesyezak:

This Anna Kendrick Little Mermaid SNL sketch is impossible to find (NBC ran into some legal issues with Disney)… watch while you can!

tagged → #byyye

If your favorite (book) character is bad handle in an adaptation you have EVERY RIGHT to be picky. Supposedly, the book is the canon, and yeah it’s impossible to and adaptation to stick at 100% to the canon but OOC is not ok. It’s not right to change a character personality just because you can or to please the audience.

I’m still on the Ramsay subject but yeah I won’t be surprised if the show fucked up his, Reek and Jeyne storyline/character. I’m going to whine a bit here but LOOK AT WHAT THEY DID TO MY TEAM DRAGONSTONE? To Stannis?? (To the point I made a distinction between show!Stannis and book!Stannis) to Selyse? And I can go hours like this.

It sucks, a lot. Especially when it’s your favorite characters (looking at you show!Stannis) and yes complaining is not being picky when it comes to OOC. Being picky is complaining about the wrong color of someone’s cloak or hair. A character personality is the most important thing in a book. It’s what defines his actions it’s not something you can mess with like that when adapting a book.

At least in my opinion.

faeries-in-the-dreadfort:

RANTING OF GAME OF THRONES S4 E2 .. SPOILERS [Pertaining to the Boltons…. Only up to our current episode, and previous book storylines which have thus far been ignored] DON’T READ DON’T READ…

[of course this could all be subject to change, being that it is only episode 2] .. to note: I have…

About Ramsay’s girlfriend

I won’t ever accept *her* as Ramsay’s girlfriend unless she truly loves him/trust him and he cold bloody cuts her throat for annoying him. I hate the idea that:

1) His character is softened (by having him cute and happy with Myranda(?) yes it softened him), and if his character is softened the viewer will seek reasons to his madness and reasons to justify his crimes and abused. And no. Just no.

2) The viewer will mistaken Ramsay’s behavior for the average Bolton behavior and no, nope, Ramsay is way worst than the average Bolton. He’s not just a bastard trying to get recognition, he is a sociopath.

3) His girlfriend (Myranda?) is there killing girls for jealousy. Ramsay’s killing is justified in a way and I don’t know if it was to appeal feminists or idk (because yeah, a man killing and innocent girl blahblah) but it’s not right at all?? I mean I like even less seeing a woman killed an innocent girl out of jealousy to satisfy her and her man (Ramsay enjoy the hunt and she knows it), that Ramsay a concrete MONSTER killing an innocent girl because no reason in particular he just likes to kill. There for my feminist rant.